Summary of
Barbara B. Stumph’s Notes on
“Panel
Discussion: The Future of Democracy
in
January 20,
2009
Speakers:
Micahel Armacost,
Stanford, former Ambassador to
Fredrick Chien, Chairman, Cathay
Charity Foundation; former Foreign Minister of Taiwan, 1990-1996
Han Sung-joo, Former foreign
minister of
Robert Scalapino, Professor
Emeritus, Polit. Science; Founding Director, Institute of East Asian Studies,
U.C. Berkeley
Jack Wadsworth (moderator), Asia
Society Northern CA; Advisory Director of Morgan Stanley globally.
Speaker I: Scalapino: (notes are paraphrased unless indicated by
quotations)
What is our
working definition of democracy?
Case of
-
formerly
militaristic; took over
-
now,
-
traditional
leaders: heredity, relatively aged; factional
-
no
fear of collapse of democracy
-
Case
of
-
elections:
President Bok is centrist, conservative, free elections
-
economic
problems; popularity declining
-
need
economic reform
-
no
fear of collapse of democracy
Case of
-
significant
changes
-
President
Ma is centrist pushing for economic interaction with
-
fundamental
to this case is keeping their economic space
-
somewhat
isolated in international community
-
need
proactive leadership who take risks
-
cross
straits issues presents a challenge
Case of
-
monarch
at top; hermit kingdom historically—still practices isolation
-
military
at top; self-reliance
-
military
is formidable force
-
crucial
issue is nuclearization
-
I
see little chance of collapse
Case of
-
on
our terms,
-
vast
in size; heterogeneous; tremendous gains
-
economic
growth
-
-
yet
Party continues to confront criticism and independence of thought
-
Three
semi-conflicting forces: internationalism, Nationalism, communalism (search of
individuals for a more solid identity, religious interest is growing,
ethnicity, local community)
Speaker II:
Fredrick Chien
-
Democracies
outlined by Dr. Scalapino will flourish but not a
tranquil period
-
-
last
year general election; two successful changes of gov
-
however people are drastically polarized between those who consider
themselves “Chinese” and seek reunification with the mainland;
versus those who consider themselves “Taiwanese”; the latter seek
independence from
-
heated
campaigns; respect will be given in the end
-
we
were ahead of the four dragons of
-
PRC
could not tolerate
-
1,300
missiles toward
-
long
travel distance between
-
85.9%
of people in
-
global
recession: not effected people devoted to democracy
-
still
-
“There
is no rational and serious discussion of politics”
-
Ma
tried to settle problems: paying heavy price
-
In
1988 when I was posted in Wash DC for six years, 60% of Taiwan wanted status
quo; 6% favored unification; PRC has caused us to be isolated to placate the
military there; restrict NGO’s; alienate our
people.
-
Must
change PRC attitudes: gradually on the right track , if they give
-
corruption
and bribery are still issues in
-
What
can Obama do: important for
-
Major
task is to seek democracy in consolidation
-
-
first
test will be G 20 have middle tier countries
-
divisions
among population in
-
Cross
Straits dialogues: first in 1993; 1195, talk in university; 2nd dialogue not
held; since then, May of last year, resumed in Aug /Nov: now one hour 40 min
between
-
Taiwanese
want total independence from
Speaker
III: Michael Armacost
-
-
Parties
honor parliamentary golden rule (treat other party the way they want to be
treated)
-
military
is ruled by civilians
-
But
-
aligned
with Socialists to get a majority; now opposition party has a shot at getting
elected
-
political
neutrality of civil service is not tested
-
balance
is skewed toward bureaucracy
-
Issues
are N. Korean issue: US not taking Japanese concerns into consideration
adequately
-
Obama
is celebrated in
-
Paper by:
Jan Sung-Joo
If you wish
to read the paper by Jan Sung-Joo in its entirety:
write Barbara Stumph: bbornets@yahoo.com
-
S.Korean democracy is “alive and thriving there”:
“leaders are accountable and ultimately removable by a majority of the
people” (Joseph Nye’s definition) in spite of violent
confrontations in national Assembly; ‘Koreans have been taught since 1948
to love, fight for, and support democracy’; still a “tortuous road;
elections can be seen as power grab”; deep divisions between haves/have nots and on issues such as N. Korea, S.Korea
relations with US; need serious debate on constitutionalism, (limited
government), personal liberties, majority rule, minority rights.
-
unthinkable
that a group of military leaders could undo democracy there, or agitation by
radical groups or ideological groups
-
-
financial
crisis faced in 1997-98 and economic crisis facing now, Korean people will
continue to strengthen democratic system and keep the faith in the system
-
There
were several penetrating questions and further discussion of current economic
crises in US and
Respectfully
submitted,
Barbara Bornet Stumph