share

Breaking With the Past? Civil-Military Relations in the Emerging Democracies of East Asia

by 

Aurel Croissant, David Kuehn, and Philip Lorenz

Policy Studies, No. 63

Publisher:

Honolulu: East-West Center

Publication Date: 2012
ISBN: 978-0-86638-226-7 (print); 978-0-86638-227-4 (electronic)
Binding: paper
Pages: x, 72
Free Download: PDF

 

Additional titles in the Policy Studies series

Hard copies are available from Amazon.com.

In Asia, hard copies are available from the
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).

In recent decades, several East Asian nations have undergone democratic transitions accompanied by changes in the balance of power between civilian elites and military leaders. These developments have not followed a single pattern: In Thailand, failure to institutionalize civilian control has contributed to the breakdown of democracy; civil-military relations and democracy in the Philippines are in prolonged crisis; and civilian control in Indonesia is yet to be institutionalized. At the same time, South Korea and Taiwan have established civilian supremacy and made great advances in consolidating democracy. These differences can be explained by the interplay of structural environment and civilian political entrepreneurship. In Taiwan, Korea, and Indonesia, strategic action, prioritization, and careful timing helped civilians make the best of their structural opportunities to overcome legacies of military involvement in politics. In Thailand, civilians overestimated their ability to control the military and provoked military intervention. In the Philippines, civilian governments forged a symbiotic relationship with military elites that allowed civilians to survive in office but also protected the military's institutional interests. These differences in the development of civil-military relations had serious repercussions on national security, political stability, and democratic consolidation, helping to explain why South Korea, Taiwan, and, to a lesser degree, Indonesia have experienced successful democratic transformation, while Thailand and the Philippines have failed to establish stable democratic systems.

About the authors
Aurel Croissant is professor of political science at Heidelberg University, Germany, and can be reached at aurel.croissant@urz.uni-heidelberg.de. David Kuehn (kuehn@uni-heidelberg.de) and Philip Lorenz (voelkel@uni-heidelberg.de) are research and teaching fellows at the Institute of Political Science, Heidelberg University.

Book Citation Index button