share

Thinking beyond Kopassus: Why US Security Assistance to Indonesia Needs Recalibrating

by 

Evan A. Laksmana

Asia Pacific Bulletin, No. 68

Publisher:

Washington, D.C.: East-West Center

Publication Date: September 17, 2010
Binding: electronic
Pages: 2
Free Download: PDF

 

Foreign security assistance, in particular the International Military Education and Training (IMET), Foreign Military Sales, and other programs under the auspices of the US Pacific Command's Theater Security Cooperation, is a keystone in America's engagement strategy with Asia. Primarily administered by the US Departments of State and Defense, these assistance programs have funneled several billions of dollars worth of equipment, education, and training, along with other forms of "local capacity building," to partner militaries across the region. Indeed, given the growing strains on the American economy as well as US commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan, the need for burden sharing among American allies and partners in Asia is becoming more critical. As such, the United States is increasing its reliance on foreign security assistance to help regional partners tackle their own security challenges. As Secretary of Defense Robert Gates argues in the May/June 2010 issue of Foreign Affairs, "the effectiveness and credibility of the United States will only be as good as the effectiveness, credibility, and sustainability of its local partners." Evan A. Laksmana takes a second look at the major challenges that surround US foreign security assistance to Indonesia.

The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of the East-West Center or any organization with which the author is affiliated.